Leslie S. Pratch

Book Examines Coping Styles of Real-World Leaders

Leslie S. Pratch

Leslie S. Pratch

Leslie S. Pratch, a licensed clinical psychologist, is the author of LOOKS GOOD ON PAPER? Using In-Depth Personality Assessment to Predict Leadership Performance, a book published by Columbia Business School Publishing in 2014. In the book, Leslie S. Pratch examines real-world leaders to gain insight into their coping styles. These leaders include President Abraham Lincoln and General Ulysses S. Grant, both of whom Leslie Pratch discusses in this excerpt:

“Lincoln didn’t have the option to assess his generals using clinical psychological methods; he had to make choices knowing their overt strengths and weaknesses, but not their covert, unconscious tolerance for stress. Using current methods to uncover his generals’ coping structures, he might have gotten a more accurate picture of how they would handle the trauma of war. A thorough assessment would likely have caught McClellan’s hesitation to act under pressure, and Grant’s underlying determination to push through against all odds. Although Grant was not an active coper in many situations, such as leading the country during peacetime, he was the right leader for the particular situation that had nearly destroyed the Union. His particular coping style made him the right military leader during wartime.”

To read additional excerpts from LOOKS GOOD ON PAPER?, log on to www.pratchco.com/publications/looks-good-on-paper. Readers can also purchase a copy of the book at www.amazon.com/dp/0231168365/ref=rdr_ext_tmb.

Looks Good on Paper pic

Four Domains to Assess in a Potential Portfolio Company Manager

Looks Good on Paper pic

Looks Good on Paper
Image: amazon.com

A graduate of Northwestern University with a PhD in clinical psychology, Dr. Leslie S. Pratch is the founder and CEO of Pratch & Company. Over the course of her career, she has assessed candidates for top leadership positions and has written extensively on the qualities that make executives successful. In May of 2015, Dr. Leslie S. Pratch published an article on this subject titled What Do You Look for in a Senior Executive?

In the article, Dr. Leslie Pratch outlines four domains to assess when considering a potential portfolio company manager: judgment, influence, management, and personality. The article defines the judgment domain as follows: “Judgment includes all of the technical, professional/intellectual and creative capabilities that let people make sense of the world around them — to see the forest for the trees; analyze complex data; break problems down into their component parts; reach logical conclusions; and generate alternative and new solutions so that they can understand, assess, and determine what needs to be done.”

The article describes the influence domain in the following way: “Influence includes the communications, interpersonal, persuasion, and political competencies that allow someone to work effectively with clients and colleagues: to explain, persuade, sell, cajole, network, negotiate, and lobby so that they can successfully influence others and gain their support to get things done. Influence involves gaining support while lacking formal authority.”

Dr. Pratch goes on to describe what to look for in the management domain: “Management covers project and people management — planning, organizing, scheduling, monitoring, and controlling work; developing, counseling, and directing people; building teams and resolving conflicts so as to ensure services are delivered, results are produced, and projects are completed on time.”

Lastly, the article discusses the personality domain as follows: “Personality includes personal traits and tendencies such as drive, self-confidence, decisiveness, tenacity, flexibility, and resilience. All of these enable individuals to meet and overcome the stresses, challenges, conflicts, and obstacles that may affect performance in the other three domains.”

By evaluating potential leaders for the competencies within these domains, portfolio companies have a better chance of putting the right leaders in place.